Before launch

Help shape expert-grounded technical AI.

Grounded Advisor applies trusted technical judgment from PR review to feature tradeoffs to architecture decisions. Every recommendation should tie back to approved expert material.

This form is for early testers, technical experts who may want to participate, and people who want to talk about where this could go.

Interest form

Step 1 of 5 - Start here

What brings you here? Choose the closest fit Technical lane, role, or interest area

Your details

Name Email

Public handle, profile, or website

How would you use it or shape it? PR review level If you are a user: what PR feedback would help? If you are an expert: what should the advisor notice in a diff? Feature or architecture level What tradeoffs, defaults, or architecture decisions should this help with?

If you might be an expert

Expert participation is meant to create paid usage whenever your approved corpus grounds decisions at the PR, feature, or architecture level.

What can the advisor use? Links to posts, talks, newsletters, docs, courses, books, repos, or pages you would approve as source material.

What must it cite carefully? What should it avoid?

If expert participation, payout preference

Next step Preferred next step What would make this worth your time? Anything else?

I understand this is exploratory, not a public listing, endorsement, affiliation announcement, or commitment from either side. You may contact me about Grounded Advisor.